![]() ![]() Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 624–634.įallon, A. Errors in speech and short-term memory: The effects of phonemic similarity and syllable position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 208–250.Įllis, A. Attributes and priorities in short-term recall: A new model of memory span. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 365–373.ĭrewnowski, A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 599–607.Ĭrowder, R. The sound of vowels and consonants in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429–432.Ĭrowder, R. Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. Journal of Verbal Learning, 4, 161–169.Ĭonrad, R., & Hull, A. Order error in immediate recall of sequences. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists. ![]() Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 429–460.īurgess, N., & Hitch, G. Toward a network model of the articulatory loop. Modelling item length effects in memory span: No rehearsal needed? Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 594–621.īurgess, N., & Hitch, G. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 701–711.īrown, G. Basic processes in reading: Two phonological codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.īesner, D., & Davelaar, E. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56, 851–864.īartlett, F. Oxford: Oxford University Press.īaddeley, A. How does acoustic similarity influence shortterm memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 249–263.īaddeley, A. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 302–309.īaddeley, A. The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for word sequences. ![]() Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. Auditory-verbal short-term memory and conduction aphasia. But consonant frame lists with differing midvowels have higher item recall, serial recall, and position accuracy scores than do rhyme lists.Īllport, D. In the view of Fallon, Groves, and Tehan’s (1999) study and the present study, rhyming improves item recall and serial recall but diminishes position accuracy, regardless of lexicality. Recognition was better for consonant frame lists than for rhyme lists, and there was a marginally significant reversal of PSE when consonant frame lists were compared with distinct lists. In serial recognition, PSE was absent when rhyme lists were compared with distinct lists. PSE was reversed when serial recall and item recall scores of rhyme items and consonant frame items were compared with distinct items, but it was present in the position accuracy score of rhyme lists. PSE was absent in serial recall, regardless of scoring procedure, when phonologically similar items that shared the midvowel were compared with phonologically distinct items. PSE was critically affected by the scoring procedure and the type of phonological similarity involved, and the effect diverged in several ways from the findings of previous studies on words. The phonological similarity effect (PSE) was studied with lists of nonwords in one task of serial recall and one task of serial recognition. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |